The authors contributing to this series are some of the best critical thinkers in their field of study.Dr. Rich SchuttlerPro Progress AcademyPhoenix, AZ
Dr. Cheryl is one of the most vibrant, intelligent, and creative individuals, I have ever worked with.Dr. Laura GrandgenettCassville, WI
Cheryl is a special leader and visionary, a strong APA editor, and evolving publisher, and a great speaker. She is not afraid to fail in order to succeed and as a result accomplishes more than others might attempt.Dr. Tom WoodruffWalden UniversityGeorgetown, TX
The Refractive Thinker® is a roadmap that discusses many dimensions of change management.Mary Beth HartlebPrism Global Management GroupHenderson, NV
Dr. Cheryl developed a totally new approach to publishing for The Refractive Thinker.®.Dr. Edward KnabEmbry Riddle UniversityPalm Springs, CA
The Refractive Thinker® demonstrates a clear understanding of the doctoral learner’s need for professional networking, intellectual marketing of peer works.Dr. Lucy Surhyel NewmanLagos, Nigeria
To find the hidden open positions, you have to network with the ‘righ’t people and the members of The Refractive Thinker® community are ‘the right people’. After a recent layoff, I reached out to The Refractive Thinker® community to assist in my job search. Success!Dr. Karleen YappColorado State University-GlobalDelran, New Jersey
Publishing is an expensive venture, time consuming, and most times heartbreaking just trying to get through the door. Who has an easy time with rejection of what may be potentially life changing theories? Join The Refractive Thinker® Family where academic writing is economically published.Dr. Beverly CarterNew Rochelle, New York
“Dear Dr. Cheryl Lentz: As we are working towards completing my book, I find that your editing is very thorough and detailed. I wish many college professors can learn from your style”. Zack Hasan, Ph.D., P.E.
My promotion to full Professor was just approved. According to the feedback I’ve received, my chapter in The Refractive Thinker was a factor in establishing my scholarship credentials.Dr. Joseph PughProfessor
RT Vol XVII: Ch 10: Why Can’t Professional Educators Talk About the Elephants in the Room?: The Undiscussables of Culture
From the Book: The Refractive Thinker® Vol XVII: Managing a Cultural Workforce: The Impact of Global Employees
SummaryReasons are numerous for not discussing the elephant in the room. Understandably, nobody wants to be misunderstood, misinterpreted, or labeled as a purveyor of hate. The goal of this writing was to present a refractive thinking approach to addressing these undiscussables. The undiscussables repeatedly surface when questions or comments about either side of a hot topic arise. Do faculty truly have free speech in the classroom, faculty meetings, or simply publicly voicing perspectives on issues that directly affect their work? It appears that necessary, but potentially controversial or sensitive dialogue can no longer occur in academia without serious fallout within the major and social medias or education administration. When faculty cannot speak from the point of experience or observation, where does this leave our students and their educational experiences? Immigration control and border safety has accentuated issues with The Dream Act and DACA. Immigrant students are filling our classrooms. and professional educators bear a tremendous responsibility for their learning. We are scholars and members of the education community. We have a duty to prepare students to succeed personally and professionally among diverse, peers, colleagues and businesses. We cannot change what we cannot discuss, calmly, rationally, and with thoughtful consideration.
Actions taken by Kaepaernick and Benson demonstrate the severity of repercussions. President Trump’s rhetoric has escalated racism, hatred, and bigoted musings. Is it possible that situations such as the Unite the Right political rally in Charlottesville, North Carolina could have been avoided by engaging in dialogue on sensitive topics? Is there a fine line between freedom of speech and undiscussable hot topics? On the political stage, it is compelling that undiscussable topics be discussed if we are to explore solutions to real problems as a society and a nation. Purposely sidestepping dialogue hinders forward progress toward solutions. Will potential consequences of avoiding the elephant in the room outweigh one over the other? Given the information in this chapter through the eyes of a refractive thinker, it is indeed a possibility.